雅思写作考试的特点是话题范围广和考题多样化。让千千万万的雅思考生们感到茫然不知所措。不妨多看看历年雅思作文范文，那你知道雅思作文范文有哪些吗?下面是小编收集整理的一些雅思作文范文，大家一起来看看吧!
雅思作文范文
话题 ：Some people argue that the government should not pay money for international aid when there are some disadvantaged people at home (homeless or unemployed). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题材：政府+投资
题型：在何种程度上同意还是不同意?
关键词：government + international aid + disadvantaged people at home
需要讨论的观点：当本国还有一些人不富裕时，比如失业者或无家可归者，政府还应该援助他国吗?
建议思路：分层次讨论
复现情况：新题
类似真题：
1. Some people believe countries have moral obligation to help each other, while others worry about aid money does not reach the poor people. 有人认为国家之间有义务互相帮助，但也有人认为穷人接收不到援助。(2016/5/21)
2. Some people think giving aid to poorer countries have more negative effects than positive effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 有人认为援助穷国的坏处多于好处。(2013/10/10)
3. Some people think charity organisations should help people in great need wherever they live.However, others think they should help people in their own country.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 有人认为慈善机构应该所有需要帮助的人，也有人认为慈善机构只应该帮助本国人。(2016/8/20)
本题涉及政府投资问题：当本国还有一些人没有房子住(homeless),没有工作干(unemployed)的时候，政府是否应该把钱用来援助其他国家的人(international aid)?这个问题其实我们并不陌生。
思考这个问题的关键是：政府为什么要援助其他国家?如果仅仅从经济上考量，当本国人还有一些人吃不饱、穿不暖时，把钱投给其他国家，的确是令人不可理解的。但是，我们应该看到，国与国之间的交往经常不仅局限于经济考虑，还有政治和道义方面的考虑。在自己国家都还有很多困难的情况下，依然支持别的国家，将为本国赢得声誉和支持，而这些声誉和支持对于一个国家的发展来说，是至关重要的。从这个角度，本文认为：在本国还有一些民众生活困难的时候却花钱去作国际援助，这表面看起来不合理，但量力而行的国际援助却永远都是必要的，而且从长远看是有回报的。
高分范文：
Every year, the government spends tons of money on international aid, but some people do not like this, arguing that the money should go to the citizens at home still living below the poverty line.
At first glance, this opposition is well grounded. As the government of any country is mainly responsible for protecting its own citizens from harm of any kind, it seems quite absurd to give money to people in other countries when the citizens at home are suffering from poverty. For example, if there are still many people who are jobless and cannot afford their own houses, the government should try its best to help them by creating more jobs rather than paying money for international aid.
The reality, however, is that almost every country across the world, no matter how poor it is, is offering aid to other countries. When Japan was hit by Tsunami in 2003, for instance, it received financial relief from nearly all countries, North Korea included. Giving aid to those countries in need is always regarded as a right thing to do, not only because it can strengthen mutual friendship, but also because it will win global reputation for the country who gives away. This reputation will, in turn, translate into various forms of support, financially or politically, from other countries. A country which never gives aid to other countries may very likely be isolated from the rest of the world.
To conclude, offering international aid is never just a matter of money. Far from being a waste of money, it actually gives the country an opportunity to become a member of the international big family. My argument, then, is that giving appropriate financial help to other countries is always necessary, even when there are still some disadvantaged people at home.
雅思作文范文推荐：
In the past, knowledge was stored in books; nowadays, knowledge is stored in the Internet. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?过去知识储藏在书籍里，现在知识保存在网络中。是利是弊?
正文部分：
第一段，同义改写，表明观点
In the current era, knowledge can be preserved on the Internet. Some people may argue that there exist more drawbacks when books are substituted by the Internet in terms of storing knowledge, but I cannot agree with this opinion.
第二段，写一下网络信息的麻烦的地方，然后转折回来
Admittedly, users may be confused about knowledge on the Internet. Most authors hold a serious attitude towards publishing a book and will be responsible for what they write in their books. However, since the Internet is open to everyone, many amateurs pretend to be masters in some domains and deliberately spread incorrect information, which brings difficulties to beginners since they may not tell the different between right and wrong. Nevertheless, there still exist more merits if information is preserved on the Internet.
第三段，不变质~
To begin with, storing knowledge on the Internet may avoid knowledge loss to some degree. It is true that books can contain knowledge, but most books will deteriorate with age and cannot be read anymore after decades of years. However, if knowledge is stored on the Internet, as long as computers are not damaged, knowledge can still be obtained from hard drives after a long time. Thus, Internet can store knowledge for a longer time while books are limited by characteristics of paper.
第四段，效率高~
In addition, users may save a lot of time when they search information on the Internet. In the past, when people intended to find a book they want, they had to go to a library and wasted some time on finding books on the shelf. By contrast, with search engines, users can acquire knowledge in a short time by typing in some key words in a database. There is no need for people to spend time on commuting and they can just sit in front of a computer and gain what they need quickly.
第五段：小小总结就好
To sum up, the merits of storing knowledge on the Internet may overshadow the detriments caused, considering that computers can preserve knowledge for a longer time and users can find information they need efficiently.
雅思作文范文：存钱防老
Some people say that it is the responsibility for the individuals to save money for their own care when they retire. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
范文：
No one is a sand, but together we are an island. No one is alienated from the rest of the world. Everyone is in certain relevance with other people in diverse aspects in varied scales. Thus, we can see not a single person alive to be solely living for himself—he must be simultaneously shouldering various duties for multifarious groups of people ,namely, employers ,government , who must at the same time in turn undertake the duty of caring for him as well. I am not here to deny the necessity of saving money for one's aged life , but to state the reasons why the above parties to take care of an individual.
What hits me at the first thought is that employers should have the liability to take care of their employees ,for they have sacrificed their youth and shed both tears and sweat even blood for them. If employers felt free to take the duties of their elderly employees ,then they may feel so easy and comfortable to expel any of those "used" workers randomly. No just legislation can possibly tolerate this happen. And employers should have their duty to support the aged workers for their later part of life.
Another party that should also take care of an individual is the government, as no one is without a nationality, which should as well pay tax levied/imposed on him and serve and fight for his certain motherland with all his energy and health and even life. If we saw someone that has paid so much for his government to be alienated and isolated with himself, how could we feel rejuvenated when we hand out our tax and how could we feel sturdy when we face the bayonet of the enemies? So undoubtedly governments, like employers ,should take care of its citizens as well.
As we can happily conclude, this world is not one that goes without justice and warmth between people , we give when we can and we take when we need, employers as well as governments are due to unshakable responsibilities to give their care to every individual that has paid their efforts for them, this would be the way things ought to be.
雅思作文范文：国家给艺术家补助
Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists includes painters, musicians, poets, however, other people think that is a waste of money for providing this assistance. State your opinion.
To be of assistance or not, it indeed is debatable if artists deserve and require funding by the government. Firstly, I acknowledge that the benefits from artists and poets can enrich our everyday lives in so many different ways; otherwise our life would have been a lot drabber without them.
Any genuine artist most certainly deserves some form of aid and there can not be any doubt about that, however, whether they require government assistance is another issue altogether. Contrary to popular belief it seems to be that not all artists and literary personalities are wealthy, and most renowned personalities are deservedly rich and famous.
While the other large group of artists is neither rich nor famous, they do continue to produce the art works as for the passion and often the passion is what drives them. It would be ridiculous to think that any kind of financial incentives could power their creativity. However, not many of them are able to take up their passion on a full time basis because they cannot afford to. It is import to note that most creative artists are made, and were not born so. It is the vagaries of life & struggles that they have to face which fuels their creativity, in the process they need to mature into renowned to be an artist or a writer. When they do and when their work is recognized, there will not be any dearth of money or fame.
In my opinion, it would be criminal to take away this very drive and shun their creativity. Having said that, I do believe that they need to have some kind of incentives, it can be in the way of appreciation and opportunity to present their talent to the rest of the world. This could be done in various ways, for instance, giving tax incentives to amateur artists and writers or financial rebates in government owned auditoriums to stage their presentations.
In talking about artists in Australia, which has a concrete social security system in place to take care of all kinds of basic needs, any kind of added financial incentives are not only an added burden on the taxpayer. It would be an issue to find out worthy beneficiaries and there will be enough crooks who will misuse any well intended government assistance schemes. Every human being craves for recognition and money happens to be one of the means towards this end, however, as I mentioned in the beginning it is more important to acknowledge their work than provide financial assistance.
On the other hand, as a Chinese, my perception of the government's assistance is more questionable. Firstly, we need to give artists a definition and how do you classify a person who is an artist. In essence, calligraphy, poetry, music and art they all can be extended to a person who writes well, paints well in his/her Blog. To extend this artist sense further, can we say a singer is an artist? Well, there are many pop song and folk music singers in China. In the same way, a dancer, a talk show's talent, a movie star, the director, the photographer they can all be artists. And this number of artists would add up to whole population of Australia. How could the Chinese government provide any assistance without any discrimination to those artists in every classification? I personally do not believe our government has enough financial ability to accommodate this wide ganging number of artists.
As a Chinese I can see that in my country, there is still a big gap between the poor and the rich, I would rather government's financial assistance be directed toward the poor, this does not mean that I would think to provide assistance to artists is a waste of money. My point is that while we can give a true definition of artists, government should use our taxes in a way to be more accountable for.
