关于大学男女比例的雅思作文范文

　　Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?[考题重现：剑桥雅思真题5 Task One（A类）]。

　　核心词汇：equal numbers of male and female.

　　文章结构：辩论型片面式话题。

　　Throughout history, predominantly middle-class white women have led feminist movements in Western Europe and North America. The question of whether both genders should be treated equally been a source of heated discussion.One specific issue is: Should schools and universities balance number of male and female students?Personally, I am not in favor of this viewpoint.

　　Generally, the term “feminism” can be used to describe a political, cultural or economic movement aimed at establishing equal rights and legal protections for women. Feminism has driven political, cultural and sociological theories, as well as philosophies concerned with issues of gender difference. It is also a movement that advocates gender equality for women and campaigns for women's rights and interests.

　　Howeve the real meaning of feminism is often distorted by some people's misunderstandings.In fact, the number of female students at schools and universities is not a real reflection of gender equality or inequality in society.Even if the numbers were equal, the result would be nothing more than symbolic. In other words, gender equality is not a number's issue, but rather concerns true respect for women. Compared with all other forms of discrimination, gender discrimination is the most serious one. Admittedly, gender balance in schools does present some benefits to women, allowing them to learn teamwork, to develop physically and psychologically, and to cultivate interpersonal relations.Nevertheless, if we conclude that this is the meaning of sex equality, then it is simply another victory for male chauvinism.

　　Overall, politicians and experts should prudently reconsider the issue of gender equality.Alleviating symptoms will not cure the disease hidden deep within the organ. They should regard the proportion of male and female students in schools as a starting point, instead of a finishing line.

　　在整个历史长河中，中产阶级白人女性主要领导了西欧和北美的女权主义运动。是否应该平等对待男性和女性已成为一个热点话题。其中一个具体的议题就是：学校是否应该保持男女学生的数量相当？我个人并不能苟同这样的观点。

　　总体而言，“女权主义”是用来描述政治、文化和经济方面的运动，其目的在于建立男女平等的权利和对女性的法律保护。女权主义还促使政治、文化和社会理论甚至是哲学理论都对性别平等给予了一定关注。这也是一个促进性别平等及女性权利和利益的运动。

　　然而，女权主义的真正含义常常被人们的误解所扭曲。实际上，学校男女生比例根本无法反映出社会中男女是否平等。就算数量上是平等的，也只不过是象征而已，并无其他。换句话说，性别平等不单是个数量问题，而是对于女性尊严关注的问题。与其他形式的歧视相比，性别歧视是严重的。诚然，学校中男女比例一致确实给女性带来一些益处，比如允许她们团队合作学习，发展她们的身体和心理素质，以及培养人际关系等。然而，如果我们仅仅将其归结为性别平等的话，那就会是男权主义的又一次胜利罢了。

　　总之，政客和专家们应该谨慎，重新考虑性别平等问题。减轻症状无法根治深埋患处的疾病，他们应该把调整学校男女学生比例作为一个起点，而非终点。